Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
In PMLA bail matters, the prosecution must show a prima facie scheduled offence and identify specific proceeds of crime; unaccounted income alone is insufficient. The Court found the alleged Himachal Pradesh scheduled offences had ended in cancellation reports, with no independent material sustaining them, and the complaint did not identify any specific property of the applicant as proceeds of crime from the Uttar Pradesh allegations. It also held that continued custody was unjustified because investigation was complete, trial would take time, and parity with a co-accused favoured release, so Article 21 concerns outweighed the bail restrictions. Bail was granted subject to conditions.
In PMLA bail matters, the prosecution must show a prima facie scheduled offence and identify specific proceeds of crime; unaccounted income alone is insufficient. The Court found the alleged Himachal Pradesh scheduled offences had ended in cancellation reports, with no independent material sustaining them, and the complaint did not identify any specific property of the applicant as proceeds of crime from the Uttar Pradesh allegations. It also held that continued custody was unjustified because investigation was complete, trial would take time, and parity with a co-accused favoured release, so Article 21 concerns outweighed the bail restrictions. Bail was granted subject to conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
