Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In PMLA bail matters, the prosecution must show a prima facie scheduled offence and identify specific proceeds of crime; unaccounted income alone is insufficient. The Court found the alleged Himachal Pradesh scheduled offences had ended in cancellation reports, with no independent material sustaining them, and the complaint did not identify any specific property of the applicant as proceeds of crime from the Uttar Pradesh allegations. It also held that continued custody was unjustified because investigation was complete, trial would take time, and parity with a co-accused favoured release, so Article 21 concerns outweighed the bail restrictions. Bail was granted subject to conditions.
In PMLA bail matters, the prosecution must show a prima facie scheduled offence and identify specific proceeds of crime; unaccounted income alone is insufficient. The Court found the alleged Himachal Pradesh scheduled offences had ended in cancellation reports, with no independent material sustaining them, and the complaint did not identify any specific property of the applicant as proceeds of crime from the Uttar Pradesh allegations. It also held that continued custody was unjustified because investigation was complete, trial would take time, and parity with a co-accused favoured release, so Article 21 concerns outweighed the bail restrictions. Bail was granted subject to conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
