Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Writ relief against a private cryptocurrency exchange was refused because the dispute was found to be essentially private and commercial, even though many investors were said to be affected. The exchange entities were held not to be State under Article 12, as they were neither created, financed nor controlled by the State, and taxation of virtual digital assets did not change that position. The Court also declined regulatory mandamus and investigation by CBI or SIT. Claims for release of funds and compensation involved disputed facts, proof of loss and quantification, so they were left to civil, consumer or other competent fora. The appeal was dismissed.
Writ relief against a private cryptocurrency exchange was refused because the dispute was found to be essentially private and commercial, even though many investors were said to be affected. The exchange entities were held not to be State under Article 12, as they were neither created, financed nor controlled by the State, and taxation of virtual digital assets did not change that position. The Court also declined regulatory mandamus and investigation by CBI or SIT. Claims for release of funds and compensation involved disputed facts, proof of loss and quantification, so they were left to civil, consumer or other competent fora. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.