Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
A statutory mining lease creates a protected leasehold interest and property under Article 300A, so suspension of mining operations must rest on lawful authority and comply with natural justice. The suspension order was held void because the lessee received no hearing, the order rested on an erroneous view that environmental clearance had lapsed, and the State did not establish the jurisdictional facts or authority required under the relevant rules; later explanations could not cure those defects. The lost period was treated as wrongfully denied enjoyment, not as a fresh grant or renewal, so Section 8A did not bar compensatory addition. Delay, laches, and res judicata were rejected on the facts, and the lessee was entitled to the added lease period subject to compliance.
A statutory mining lease creates a protected leasehold interest and property under Article 300A, so suspension of mining operations must rest on lawful authority and comply with natural justice. The suspension order was held void because the lessee received no hearing, the order rested on an erroneous view that environmental clearance had lapsed, and the State did not establish the jurisdictional facts or authority required under the relevant rules; later explanations could not cure those defects. The lost period was treated as wrongfully denied enjoyment, not as a fresh grant or renewal, so Section 8A did not bar compensatory addition. Delay, laches, and res judicata were rejected on the facts, and the lessee was entitled to the added lease period subject to compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
