Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
A statutory mining lease creates a protected leasehold interest and property under Article 300A, so suspension of mining operations must rest on lawful authority and comply with natural justice. The suspension order was held void because the lessee received no hearing, the order rested on an erroneous view that environmental clearance had lapsed, and the State did not establish the jurisdictional facts or authority required under the relevant rules; later explanations could not cure those defects. The lost period was treated as wrongfully denied enjoyment, not as a fresh grant or renewal, so Section 8A did not bar compensatory addition. Delay, laches, and res judicata were rejected on the facts, and the lessee was entitled to the added lease period subject to compliance.
A statutory mining lease creates a protected leasehold interest and property under Article 300A, so suspension of mining operations must rest on lawful authority and comply with natural justice. The suspension order was held void because the lessee received no hearing, the order rested on an erroneous view that environmental clearance had lapsed, and the State did not establish the jurisdictional facts or authority required under the relevant rules; later explanations could not cure those defects. The lost period was treated as wrongfully denied enjoyment, not as a fresh grant or renewal, so Section 8A did not bar compensatory addition. Delay, laches, and res judicata were rejected on the facts, and the lessee was entitled to the added lease period subject to compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
