Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Statutory contributions to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) and National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET) were treated as mandatory incidents of mining operations, because the payments were fixed as a percentage of royalty and non-payment would affect the right to extract coal. On that basis, they were considered part of mining royalty paid in the course or furtherance of business. DMF contribution was nevertheless held not liable to GST because a later clarification treated State-formed DMF trusts as Governmental Authorities eligible for exemption. NMET contribution remained liable to GST, as no similar clarification applied, and the lower ruling was upheld to that extent.
Statutory contributions to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) and National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET) were treated as mandatory incidents of mining operations, because the payments were fixed as a percentage of royalty and non-payment would affect the right to extract coal. On that basis, they were considered part of mining royalty paid in the course or furtherance of business. DMF contribution was nevertheless held not liable to GST because a later clarification treated State-formed DMF trusts as Governmental Authorities eligible for exemption. NMET contribution remained liable to GST, as no similar clarification applied, and the lower ruling was upheld to that extent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
