Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Services rendered by an authorised service provider under Telangana's electronic service delivery framework were treated as distinct from supplies by the State Government. The Authority found that MeeSeva collects user charges over and above statutory fees, and that some services also relate to non-government entities. It therefore concluded that the exemption entries in Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) apply only to Government supplies and only to the extent of statutory levies for discharge of statutory functions. User charges collected separately by MeeSeva were held outside the exemption and liable to GST, so the exemption claim was rejected.
Services rendered by an authorised service provider under Telangana's electronic service delivery framework were treated as distinct from supplies by the State Government. The Authority found that MeeSeva collects user charges over and above statutory fees, and that some services also relate to non-government entities. It therefore concluded that the exemption entries in Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) apply only to Government supplies and only to the extent of statutory levies for discharge of statutory functions. User charges collected separately by MeeSeva were held outside the exemption and liable to GST, so the exemption claim was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.