Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Services rendered by an authorised service provider under Telangana's electronic service delivery framework were treated as distinct from supplies by the State Government. The Authority found that MeeSeva collects user charges over and above statutory fees, and that some services also relate to non-government entities. It therefore concluded that the exemption entries in Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) apply only to Government supplies and only to the extent of statutory levies for discharge of statutory functions. User charges collected separately by MeeSeva were held outside the exemption and liable to GST, so the exemption claim was rejected.
Services rendered by an authorised service provider under Telangana's electronic service delivery framework were treated as distinct from supplies by the State Government. The Authority found that MeeSeva collects user charges over and above statutory fees, and that some services also relate to non-government entities. It therefore concluded that the exemption entries in Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) apply only to Government supplies and only to the extent of statutory levies for discharge of statutory functions. User charges collected separately by MeeSeva were held outside the exemption and liable to GST, so the exemption claim was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
