Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
Revenue-neutral domestic transfer pricing and mirror transactions justified deletion of related-party adjustments for operation, maintenance and port ...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Under the unamended valuation provision, reference to the...
Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's report.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Under the unamended valuation provision, reference to the Valuation Officer was permissible only where the assessee's registered valuer's estimate was, in the Assessing Officer's opinion, less than fair market value; where the assessee's adopted value was higher than the AO's figure, the clause did not apply and the residuary limb could not be used. The Finance Act, 2012 amendment expanding the wording to cases where value is "at variance" with fair market value was held prospective and inapplicable to the relevant assessment year. On that basis, the reassessment founded on the impermissible valuation reference was unsustainable and the reopening notice was quashed.
Under the unamended valuation provision, reference to the Valuation Officer was permissible only where the assessee's registered valuer's estimate was, in the Assessing Officer's opinion, less than fair market value; where the assessee's adopted value was higher than the AO's figure, the clause did not apply and the residuary limb could not be used. The Finance Act, 2012 amendment expanding the wording to cases where value is "at variance" with fair market value was held prospective and inapplicable to the relevant assessment year. On that basis, the reassessment founded on the impermissible valuation reference was unsustainable and the reopening notice was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.