Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Page of 4787
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 95724 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Under the unamended valuation provision, reference to the...
Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's report.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Under the unamended valuation provision, reference to the Valuation Officer was permissible only where the assessee's registered valuer's estimate was, in the Assessing Officer's opinion, less than fair market value; where the assessee's adopted value was higher than the AO's figure, the clause did not apply and the residuary limb could not be used. The Finance Act, 2012 amendment expanding the wording to cases where value is "at variance" with fair market value was held prospective and inapplicable to the relevant assessment year. On that basis, the reassessment founded on the impermissible valuation reference was unsustainable and the reopening notice was quashed.
Under the unamended valuation provision, reference to the Valuation Officer was permissible only where the assessee's registered valuer's estimate was, in the Assessing Officer's opinion, less than fair market value; where the assessee's adopted value was higher than the AO's figure, the clause did not apply and the residuary limb could not be used. The Finance Act, 2012 amendment expanding the wording to cases where value is "at variance" with fair market value was held prospective and inapplicable to the relevant assessment year. On that basis, the reassessment founded on the impermissible valuation reference was unsustainable and the reopening notice was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.