Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Under the unamended valuation provision, reference to the...
Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's report.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Under the unamended valuation provision, reference to the Valuation Officer was permissible only where the assessee's registered valuer's estimate was, in the Assessing Officer's opinion, less than fair market value; where the assessee's adopted value was higher than the AO's figure, the clause did not apply and the residuary limb could not be used. The Finance Act, 2012 amendment expanding the wording to cases where value is "at variance" with fair market value was held prospective and inapplicable to the relevant assessment year. On that basis, the reassessment founded on the impermissible valuation reference was unsustainable and the reopening notice was quashed.
Under the unamended valuation provision, reference to the Valuation Officer was permissible only where the assessee's registered valuer's estimate was, in the Assessing Officer's opinion, less than fair market value; where the assessee's adopted value was higher than the AO's figure, the clause did not apply and the residuary limb could not be used. The Finance Act, 2012 amendment expanding the wording to cases where value is "at variance" with fair market value was held prospective and inapplicable to the relevant assessment year. On that basis, the reassessment founded on the impermissible valuation reference was unsustainable and the reopening notice was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.