Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Under the unamended valuation provision, reference to the...
Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's report.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Under the unamended valuation provision, reference to the Valuation Officer was permissible only where the assessee's registered valuer's estimate was, in the Assessing Officer's opinion, less than fair market value; where the assessee's adopted value was higher than the AO's figure, the clause did not apply and the residuary limb could not be used. The Finance Act, 2012 amendment expanding the wording to cases where value is "at variance" with fair market value was held prospective and inapplicable to the relevant assessment year. On that basis, the reassessment founded on the impermissible valuation reference was unsustainable and the reopening notice was quashed.
Under the unamended valuation provision, reference to the Valuation Officer was permissible only where the assessee's registered valuer's estimate was, in the Assessing Officer's opinion, less than fair market value; where the assessee's adopted value was higher than the AO's figure, the clause did not apply and the residuary limb could not be used. The Finance Act, 2012 amendment expanding the wording to cases where value is "at variance" with fair market value was held prospective and inapplicable to the relevant assessment year. On that basis, the reassessment founded on the impermissible valuation reference was unsustainable and the reopening notice was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
