Employee recoveries, input tax credit and notice pay recovery under GST: AAR distinguishes taxable supplies from non-taxable perquisites and penalties...
Liberal construction of sufficient cause justifies condonation of inordinate delay where criminal proceedings and jail confinement explained the defau...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5041 to 5060 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deemed notices issued between 1 April 2021 and 30 June 2021 stopped the limitation clock, and only the surviving balance period could be used for the section 148 notice after the section 148A(d) order. Applying that rule, no effective period remained for AY 2015-16, while only a short residual period survived for AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18, so the July 2022 notices were time-barred and jurisdictionally invalid. For AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18, approval from the Principal Commissioner was also insufficient because the statute required sanction from the competent authority under section 151(ii). The reassessment and the appellate remand were quashed.
Deemed notices issued between 1 April 2021 and 30 June 2021 stopped the limitation clock, and only the surviving balance period could be used for the section 148 notice after the section 148A(d) order. Applying that rule, no effective period remained for AY 2015-16, while only a short residual period survived for AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18, so the July 2022 notices were time-barred and jurisdictionally invalid. For AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18, approval from the Principal Commissioner was also insufficient because the statute required sanction from the competent authority under section 151(ii). The reassessment and the appellate remand were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.