Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
ITAT held that the deeming fiction in section 50C is confined to computation of capital gains under section 48 and cannot be extended to the expression net consideration in section 54F. Section 54F operates on the actual consideration received or accrued, after transfer expenses, and the assessee satisfied the exemption condition by investing more than the actual sale consideration in a new residential house. Applying the settled rule that a deeming provision cannot be enlarged beyond its purpose, the Tribunal allowed full exemption under section 54F and held the capital gain not chargeable to tax; the agricultural land issue was left open as academic.
ITAT held that the deeming fiction in section 50C is confined to computation of capital gains under section 48 and cannot be extended to the expression net consideration in section 54F. Section 54F operates on the actual consideration received or accrued, after transfer expenses, and the assessee satisfied the exemption condition by investing more than the actual sale consideration in a new residential house. Applying the settled rule that a deeming provision cannot be enlarged beyond its purpose, the Tribunal allowed full exemption under section 54F and held the capital gain not chargeable to tax; the agricultural land issue was left open as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.