Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
ITAT held that the deeming fiction in section 50C is confined to computation of capital gains under section 48 and cannot be extended to the expression net consideration in section 54F. Section 54F operates on the actual consideration received or accrued, after transfer expenses, and the assessee satisfied the exemption condition by investing more than the actual sale consideration in a new residential house. Applying the settled rule that a deeming provision cannot be enlarged beyond its purpose, the Tribunal allowed full exemption under section 54F and held the capital gain not chargeable to tax; the agricultural land issue was left open as academic.
ITAT held that the deeming fiction in section 50C is confined to computation of capital gains under section 48 and cannot be extended to the expression net consideration in section 54F. Section 54F operates on the actual consideration received or accrued, after transfer expenses, and the assessee satisfied the exemption condition by investing more than the actual sale consideration in a new residential house. Applying the settled rule that a deeming provision cannot be enlarged beyond its purpose, the Tribunal allowed full exemption under section 54F and held the capital gain not chargeable to tax; the agricultural land issue was left open as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.