Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
ITAT held that the deeming fiction in section 50C is confined to computation of capital gains under section 48 and cannot be extended to the expression net consideration in section 54F. Section 54F operates on the actual consideration received or accrued, after transfer expenses, and the assessee satisfied the exemption condition by investing more than the actual sale consideration in a new residential house. Applying the settled rule that a deeming provision cannot be enlarged beyond its purpose, the Tribunal allowed full exemption under section 54F and held the capital gain not chargeable to tax; the agricultural land issue was left open as academic.
ITAT held that the deeming fiction in section 50C is confined to computation of capital gains under section 48 and cannot be extended to the expression net consideration in section 54F. Section 54F operates on the actual consideration received or accrued, after transfer expenses, and the assessee satisfied the exemption condition by investing more than the actual sale consideration in a new residential house. Applying the settled rule that a deeming provision cannot be enlarged beyond its purpose, the Tribunal allowed full exemption under section 54F and held the capital gain not chargeable to tax; the agricultural land issue was left open as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.