Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Medical relief remains a distinct charitable purpose under section 12AB, and a hospital does not lose that character merely because it operates modern infrastructure, charges differential tariffs, serves paying patients or earns surplus, absent evidence of private enrichment, diversion of income, abandonment of objects, or use of funds for non-charitable purposes. For refusal or cancellation based on compliance with other laws, there must be an established breach determined by the competent authority; the income-tax authority cannot itself adjudicate alleged violations of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act or the IPF Scheme. On that basis, retrospective cancellation and the consequential refusal of related approval were unsustainable.
Medical relief remains a distinct charitable purpose under section 12AB, and a hospital does not lose that character merely because it operates modern infrastructure, charges differential tariffs, serves paying patients or earns surplus, absent evidence of private enrichment, diversion of income, abandonment of objects, or use of funds for non-charitable purposes. For refusal or cancellation based on compliance with other laws, there must be an established breach determined by the competent authority; the income-tax authority cannot itself adjudicate alleged violations of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act or the IPF Scheme. On that basis, retrospective cancellation and the consequential refusal of related approval were unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.