Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Corporate guarantee furnished to an associated enterprise for credit facilities was treated as an international transaction because the statutory explanation to section 92B covers capital financing, including guarantees, and the guarantee had a direct bearing on the enterprise's financial position; the transfer pricing challenge on that point failed. For arm's length commission, the Tribunal held that the guarantee exposure changed during the year as the underlying loan was repaid, so the risk assumed could not be measured only by the year-end balance. It sustained computation of commission at 0.50% on the average of opening and closing outstanding exposure, and dismissed the appeals.
Corporate guarantee furnished to an associated enterprise for credit facilities was treated as an international transaction because the statutory explanation to section 92B covers capital financing, including guarantees, and the guarantee had a direct bearing on the enterprise's financial position; the transfer pricing challenge on that point failed. For arm's length commission, the Tribunal held that the guarantee exposure changed during the year as the underlying loan was repaid, so the risk assumed could not be measured only by the year-end balance. It sustained computation of commission at 0.50% on the average of opening and closing outstanding exposure, and dismissed the appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.