Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
For a non-searched person, the relevant date for section 153C proceedings is the date on which the satisfaction note is recorded or seized material reaches the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in Jasjit Singh and later Tribunal/High Court followings, the Tribunal treated the first proviso to section 153C(1) as governing the operative date for all practical purposes. Because the satisfaction note was recorded after 01.04.2021, section 153C ceased to be available and the proceedings were without jurisdiction. The assessments were therefore held void ab initio and quashed.
For a non-searched person, the relevant date for section 153C proceedings is the date on which the satisfaction note is recorded or seized material reaches the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in Jasjit Singh and later Tribunal/High Court followings, the Tribunal treated the first proviso to section 153C(1) as governing the operative date for all practical purposes. Because the satisfaction note was recorded after 01.04.2021, section 153C ceased to be available and the proceedings were without jurisdiction. The assessments were therefore held void ab initio and quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
