Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
For a non-searched person, the relevant date for section 153C proceedings is the date on which the satisfaction note is recorded or seized material reaches the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in Jasjit Singh and later Tribunal/High Court followings, the Tribunal treated the first proviso to section 153C(1) as governing the operative date for all practical purposes. Because the satisfaction note was recorded after 01.04.2021, section 153C ceased to be available and the proceedings were without jurisdiction. The assessments were therefore held void ab initio and quashed.
For a non-searched person, the relevant date for section 153C proceedings is the date on which the satisfaction note is recorded or seized material reaches the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in Jasjit Singh and later Tribunal/High Court followings, the Tribunal treated the first proviso to section 153C(1) as governing the operative date for all practical purposes. Because the satisfaction note was recorded after 01.04.2021, section 153C ceased to be available and the proceedings were without jurisdiction. The assessments were therefore held void ab initio and quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
