Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Depositories are not confined to mechanical record-keeping; under the Depositories Act, the 2018 Regulations and approved bye-laws, they owe investor-protection and supervisory duties, including vigilance through enhanced supervision and an early warning mechanism. On the facts described, failure to detect dormant-account movement, off-market transfers and the subsequent pledge of client securities amounted to negligence, so the beneficial owner was entitled to indemnification and the depository could recover from the participant, who acted within the depository framework as the depository's agent. On appellate review, Section 37 permitted no reappreciation where the arbitral award and Section 34 order rested on evidence, disclosed reasons and a plausible view, so interference was refused.
Depositories are not confined to mechanical record-keeping; under the Depositories Act, the 2018 Regulations and approved bye-laws, they owe investor-protection and supervisory duties, including vigilance through enhanced supervision and an early warning mechanism. On the facts described, failure to detect dormant-account movement, off-market transfers and the subsequent pledge of client securities amounted to negligence, so the beneficial owner was entitled to indemnification and the depository could recover from the participant, who acted within the depository framework as the depository's agent. On appellate review, Section 37 permitted no reappreciation where the arbitral award and Section 34 order rested on evidence, disclosed reasons and a plausible view, so interference was refused.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
