Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Extended limitation under indirect tax law applies only where fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or contravention with intent to evade duty is shown, and the text treats non-disclosure of the contractual arrangement, delayed service tax payment, and suo motu credit taken instead of refund as sufficient to invoke it. It further notes that the same facts satisfy the basis for penalty under Rule 15(2) read with Section 11AC where suppression and wrongful availment of Cenvat credit are established. On that reasoning, the demand and penalty were sustained.
Extended limitation under indirect tax law applies only where fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or contravention with intent to evade duty is shown, and the text treats non-disclosure of the contractual arrangement, delayed service tax payment, and suo motu credit taken instead of refund as sufficient to invoke it. It further notes that the same facts satisfy the basis for penalty under Rule 15(2) read with Section 11AC where suppression and wrongful availment of Cenvat credit are established. On that reasoning, the demand and penalty were sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.