Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 95749 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A same-subject-matter bar in GST proceedings arises only when adjudicatory proceedings begin through a show-cause notice; it does not arise merely because inquiry, search, or investigation has commenced. Where overlap is noticed, the authorities may decide inter se which one continues, and the other may transfer the material. Here, the State GST authorities transferred the investigation to the Central GST authorities, so the complaint and criminal proceedings were not barred as parallel proceedings. The arrest was also upheld because the grounds of arrest were furnished in writing, explained to the petitioner, and acknowledged, consistent with governing GST arrest requirements. The petition was dismissed.
A same-subject-matter bar in GST proceedings arises only when adjudicatory proceedings begin through a show-cause notice; it does not arise merely because inquiry, search, or investigation has commenced. Where overlap is noticed, the authorities may decide inter se which one continues, and the other may transfer the material. Here, the State GST authorities transferred the investigation to the Central GST authorities, so the complaint and criminal proceedings were not barred as parallel proceedings. The arrest was also upheld because the grounds of arrest were furnished in writing, explained to the petitioner, and acknowledged, consistent with governing GST arrest requirements. The petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.