Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
A same-subject-matter bar in GST proceedings arises only when adjudicatory proceedings begin through a show-cause notice; it does not arise merely because inquiry, search, or investigation has commenced. Where overlap is noticed, the authorities may decide inter se which one continues, and the other may transfer the material. Here, the State GST authorities transferred the investigation to the Central GST authorities, so the complaint and criminal proceedings were not barred as parallel proceedings. The arrest was also upheld because the grounds of arrest were furnished in writing, explained to the petitioner, and acknowledged, consistent with governing GST arrest requirements. The petition was dismissed.
A same-subject-matter bar in GST proceedings arises only when adjudicatory proceedings begin through a show-cause notice; it does not arise merely because inquiry, search, or investigation has commenced. Where overlap is noticed, the authorities may decide inter se which one continues, and the other may transfer the material. Here, the State GST authorities transferred the investigation to the Central GST authorities, so the complaint and criminal proceedings were not barred as parallel proceedings. The arrest was also upheld because the grounds of arrest were furnished in writing, explained to the petitioner, and acknowledged, consistent with governing GST arrest requirements. The petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
