Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A writ challenge to reassessment notices on the ground that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer lacked authority under the reassessment regime between 01.04.2021 and 01.04.2024 failed, because the retrospective insertion of Section 147A altered the foundation of contrary decisions and the jurisdictional objection no longer survived. The constitutional challenge to the amended provision was not examined in the Single Judge writ proceedings, as such a vires attack had to be pursued before the Division Bench under the High Court Writ Rules. Recovery was kept in abeyance for 30 days to permit the petitioners to seek appropriate relief before the Division Bench.
A writ challenge to reassessment notices on the ground that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer lacked authority under the reassessment regime between 01.04.2021 and 01.04.2024 failed, because the retrospective insertion of Section 147A altered the foundation of contrary decisions and the jurisdictional objection no longer survived. The constitutional challenge to the amended provision was not examined in the Single Judge writ proceedings, as such a vires attack had to be pursued before the Division Bench under the High Court Writ Rules. Recovery was kept in abeyance for 30 days to permit the petitioners to seek appropriate relief before the Division Bench.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
