Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A writ challenge to reassessment notices on the ground that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer lacked authority under the reassessment regime between 01.04.2021 and 01.04.2024 failed, because the retrospective insertion of Section 147A altered the foundation of contrary decisions and the jurisdictional objection no longer survived. The constitutional challenge to the amended provision was not examined in the Single Judge writ proceedings, as such a vires attack had to be pursued before the Division Bench under the High Court Writ Rules. Recovery was kept in abeyance for 30 days to permit the petitioners to seek appropriate relief before the Division Bench.
A writ challenge to reassessment notices on the ground that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer lacked authority under the reassessment regime between 01.04.2021 and 01.04.2024 failed, because the retrospective insertion of Section 147A altered the foundation of contrary decisions and the jurisdictional objection no longer survived. The constitutional challenge to the amended provision was not examined in the Single Judge writ proceedings, as such a vires attack had to be pursued before the Division Bench under the High Court Writ Rules. Recovery was kept in abeyance for 30 days to permit the petitioners to seek appropriate relief before the Division Bench.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
