Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty for misreporting of income under section 270A could not be sustained where the assessee had disclosed the interest income and the dispute concerned only eligibility for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal held that penalty proceedings are distinct from assessment proceedings, and an addition or disallowance by itself does not establish misreporting; the Assessing Officer must show that the case falls within a specific statutory category. The assessee's explanation that incorrect PAN status caused a technical difficulty was found bona fide, and there was no material of false particulars or suppression. The penalty also failed because the notice mentioned only under-reporting, while the final levy was for under-reporting due to misreporting without specifying the relevant charge.
Penalty for misreporting of income under section 270A could not be sustained where the assessee had disclosed the interest income and the dispute concerned only eligibility for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal held that penalty proceedings are distinct from assessment proceedings, and an addition or disallowance by itself does not establish misreporting; the Assessing Officer must show that the case falls within a specific statutory category. The assessee's explanation that incorrect PAN status caused a technical difficulty was found bona fide, and there was no material of false particulars or suppression. The penalty also failed because the notice mentioned only under-reporting, while the final levy was for under-reporting due to misreporting without specifying the relevant charge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
