Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Offshore principal-to-principal sales of cars were held not taxable in India because the Indian distributor was an independent entity and did not constitute either a fixed place permanent establishment or a dependent agent permanent establishment under Article 5 of the India-Germany DTAA. The cars were manufactured outside India and sold outside India, and the Revenue could not show any distinguishing factual or legal feature from earlier co-ordinate Bench rulings in the assessee's own case. As no PE existed, the addition treating the business income as taxable in India was unsustainable, and attribution and related computation did not survive; consequential relief followed.
Offshore principal-to-principal sales of cars were held not taxable in India because the Indian distributor was an independent entity and did not constitute either a fixed place permanent establishment or a dependent agent permanent establishment under Article 5 of the India-Germany DTAA. The cars were manufactured outside India and sold outside India, and the Revenue could not show any distinguishing factual or legal feature from earlier co-ordinate Bench rulings in the assessee's own case. As no PE existed, the addition treating the business income as taxable in India was unsustainable, and attribution and related computation did not survive; consequential relief followed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
