Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Cash is treated as property under the Act, and routing demonetised cash through another person's bank account and back through banking channels can amount to a benami arrangement if the alleged business deal is not genuine. The Tribunal relied on inconsistencies in stock records, invoices, bank entries and the claimed gold sale, and noted the absence of purchaser KYC, PAN and reliable proof of delivery through the broker; it treated the broker's affidavit as insufficient. It also rejected objections on non-examination of the alleged account operator and on cross-examination, finding the person untraceable and no prejudice shown. The attachment was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Cash is treated as property under the Act, and routing demonetised cash through another person's bank account and back through banking channels can amount to a benami arrangement if the alleged business deal is not genuine. The Tribunal relied on inconsistencies in stock records, invoices, bank entries and the claimed gold sale, and noted the absence of purchaser KYC, PAN and reliable proof of delivery through the broker; it treated the broker's affidavit as insufficient. It also rejected objections on non-examination of the alleged account operator and on cross-examination, finding the person untraceable and no prejudice shown. The attachment was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.