Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An efficacious statutory appeal under Section 9C is available against anti-dumping final findings, disclosure statements and the consequential notification, and writ interference remains confined to gross violation of natural justice, breach of mandatory statutory provisions or lack of jurisdiction. The text explains that where the designated authority has considered stakeholder submissions, supplied non-confidential material, maintained confidentiality where claimed and afforded hearing, disputes over dumping margin, injury margin, landed value, non-injurious price, methodology and valuation are merits issues for the appellate forum rather than writ review. Pending proceedings before the tribunal are also treated as a reason to decline extraordinary jurisdiction.
An efficacious statutory appeal under Section 9C is available against anti-dumping final findings, disclosure statements and the consequential notification, and writ interference remains confined to gross violation of natural justice, breach of mandatory statutory provisions or lack of jurisdiction. The text explains that where the designated authority has considered stakeholder submissions, supplied non-confidential material, maintained confidentiality where claimed and afforded hearing, disputes over dumping margin, injury margin, landed value, non-injurious price, methodology and valuation are merits issues for the appellate forum rather than writ review. Pending proceedings before the tribunal are also treated as a reason to decline extraordinary jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.