Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Execution of a promissory note proved by admitted signatures, a...
Promissory note presumption of consideration survives blank-signature and income-tax non-disclosure objections when admissions and attesting evidence prove execution
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Execution of a promissory note proved by admitted signatures, a handwritten reply, and attesting evidence attracts the presumption of consideration, and a blank signed note may operate as an inchoate instrument unless rebutted. The forgery plea failed because no expert or other rebuttal evidence was produced, and the admission in the pre-suit reply was treated as the best evidence of liability. Non-disclosure of the transaction in income tax returns, especially when not specifically pleaded, does not by itself make the debt unenforceable between the parties or defeat recovery on the proved note.
Execution of a promissory note proved by admitted signatures, a handwritten reply, and attesting evidence attracts the presumption of consideration, and a blank signed note may operate as an inchoate instrument unless rebutted. The forgery plea failed because no expert or other rebuttal evidence was produced, and the admission in the pre-suit reply was treated as the best evidence of liability. Non-disclosure of the transaction in income tax returns, especially when not specifically pleaded, does not by itself make the debt unenforceable between the parties or defeat recovery on the proved note.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.