Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Selective revaluation noted by the auditor did not by itself disqualify certified accounts for MAT purposes or justify excluding depreciation on the revaluation component from book profit. The High Court held that once the accounts complied with the Companies Act and were certified under the statutory audit framework, the Assessing Officer could not go behind the book profit except to the limited extent permitted under the MAT provisions. The Tribunal erred in treating the auditor's qualification note as undermining the true and fair view of the accounts; the assessee succeeded and the CIT(A)'s order was restored.
Selective revaluation noted by the auditor did not by itself disqualify certified accounts for MAT purposes or justify excluding depreciation on the revaluation component from book profit. The High Court held that once the accounts complied with the Companies Act and were certified under the statutory audit framework, the Assessing Officer could not go behind the book profit except to the limited extent permitted under the MAT provisions. The Tribunal erred in treating the auditor's qualification note as undermining the true and fair view of the accounts; the assessee succeeded and the CIT(A)'s order was restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.