Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
TDS credit cannot be denied merely because tax was deducted in the assessee's PAN for sale proceeds said to belong to another person, where the assessee was only a commission agent and the tax had in fact been deducted and deposited in the Government treasury. The Tribunal held that, on admitted facts, the assessee was entitled to credit of the amount actually deducted in his PAN. Section 199 read with Rule 37BA(2) did not justify refusal of credit on the ground that the underlying sale receipts belonged to the farmer; at most, the deduction was excessive, not non-creditable.
TDS credit cannot be denied merely because tax was deducted in the assessee's PAN for sale proceeds said to belong to another person, where the assessee was only a commission agent and the tax had in fact been deducted and deposited in the Government treasury. The Tribunal held that, on admitted facts, the assessee was entitled to credit of the amount actually deducted in his PAN. Section 199 read with Rule 37BA(2) did not justify refusal of credit on the ground that the underlying sale receipts belonged to the farmer; at most, the deduction was excessive, not non-creditable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.