Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
TDS credit cannot be denied merely because tax was deducted in the assessee's PAN for sale proceeds said to belong to another person, where the assessee was only a commission agent and the tax had in fact been deducted and deposited in the Government treasury. The Tribunal held that, on admitted facts, the assessee was entitled to credit of the amount actually deducted in his PAN. Section 199 read with Rule 37BA(2) did not justify refusal of credit on the ground that the underlying sale receipts belonged to the farmer; at most, the deduction was excessive, not non-creditable.
TDS credit cannot be denied merely because tax was deducted in the assessee's PAN for sale proceeds said to belong to another person, where the assessee was only a commission agent and the tax had in fact been deducted and deposited in the Government treasury. The Tribunal held that, on admitted facts, the assessee was entitled to credit of the amount actually deducted in his PAN. Section 199 read with Rule 37BA(2) did not justify refusal of credit on the ground that the underlying sale receipts belonged to the farmer; at most, the deduction was excessive, not non-creditable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.