Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment based only on Investigation Wing material was held invalid where the recorded reasons showed no independent inquiry, no tangible material and no live nexus between the information and alleged escapement; in cases reopened beyond four years after scrutiny assessment, the absence of any identified failure to disclose fully and truly also barred jurisdiction. On merits, additions treating share sale proceeds as unexplained credits were deleted because the assessees had already disclosed the corresponding capital gains or losses and supported the transactions with contract notes, bank and demat records, broker ledgers and tax evidence, making a further addition impermissible double addition. General investigation or SEBI material without assessee-specific linkage could not sustain a penny stock allegation. Consequential commission additions were also deleted.
Reassessment based only on Investigation Wing material was held invalid where the recorded reasons showed no independent inquiry, no tangible material and no live nexus between the information and alleged escapement; in cases reopened beyond four years after scrutiny assessment, the absence of any identified failure to disclose fully and truly also barred jurisdiction. On merits, additions treating share sale proceeds as unexplained credits were deleted because the assessees had already disclosed the corresponding capital gains or losses and supported the transactions with contract notes, bank and demat records, broker ledgers and tax evidence, making a further addition impermissible double addition. General investigation or SEBI material without assessee-specific linkage could not sustain a penny stock allegation. Consequential commission additions were also deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.