Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Royalty added to the transaction value of imported raw materials was held unsustainable where the same Technology Assistance Agreement had already been examined in the assessee's own case and the royalty was not shown to be a condition of sale of the imported goods. In the absence of any change in facts, documents, or law, the earlier valuation ruling was followed and the demand for differential customs duty could not be sustained. The consequential interest and penalty were also set aside, with relief allowed accordingly.
Royalty added to the transaction value of imported raw materials was held unsustainable where the same Technology Assistance Agreement had already been examined in the assessee's own case and the royalty was not shown to be a condition of sale of the imported goods. In the absence of any change in facts, documents, or law, the earlier valuation ruling was followed and the demand for differential customs duty could not be sustained. The consequential interest and penalty were also set aside, with relief allowed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.