Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3061 to 3080 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
EPCG exemption for second-hand textile machinery was upheld where the importer held a valid DGFT authorisation, the customs notification contained no year-of-manufacture restriction, and there was no evidence that the notification's conditions were otherwise breached. Fulfilment of the export obligation and redemption of the EPCG licence showed compliance with the scheme. A vintage restriction could not be imported by linking the case to the TUF Scheme, so the duty demand, interest and consequential penalties, including the Director's penalty, were set aside.
EPCG exemption for second-hand textile machinery was upheld where the importer held a valid DGFT authorisation, the customs notification contained no year-of-manufacture restriction, and there was no evidence that the notification's conditions were otherwise breached. Fulfilment of the export obligation and redemption of the EPCG licence showed compliance with the scheme. A vintage restriction could not be imported by linking the case to the TUF Scheme, so the duty demand, interest and consequential penalties, including the Director's penalty, were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.