Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
EPCG exemption for second-hand textile machinery was upheld where the importer held a valid DGFT authorisation, the customs notification contained no year-of-manufacture restriction, and there was no evidence that the notification's conditions were otherwise breached. Fulfilment of the export obligation and redemption of the EPCG licence showed compliance with the scheme. A vintage restriction could not be imported by linking the case to the TUF Scheme, so the duty demand, interest and consequential penalties, including the Director's penalty, were set aside.
EPCG exemption for second-hand textile machinery was upheld where the importer held a valid DGFT authorisation, the customs notification contained no year-of-manufacture restriction, and there was no evidence that the notification's conditions were otherwise breached. Fulfilment of the export obligation and redemption of the EPCG licence showed compliance with the scheme. A vintage restriction could not be imported by linking the case to the TUF Scheme, so the duty demand, interest and consequential penalties, including the Director's penalty, were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.