Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Mandatory CAMPA-related deposits made to obtain permission for diversion of forest land were treated as consideration for a taxable supply of government service. The permission was described as a specific statutory approval conferring a direct benefit on an identified business entity, so the payment had a direct nexus with the supply. Exemption under entries for functions entrusted to municipalities or panchayats was denied because the approval was a forest-regulatory function, not a municipal or panchayat activity. GST was therefore payable under reverse charge on the deposits made for the forest clearance.
Mandatory CAMPA-related deposits made to obtain permission for diversion of forest land were treated as consideration for a taxable supply of government service. The permission was described as a specific statutory approval conferring a direct benefit on an identified business entity, so the payment had a direct nexus with the supply. Exemption under entries for functions entrusted to municipalities or panchayats was denied because the approval was a forest-regulatory function, not a municipal or panchayat activity. GST was therefore payable under reverse charge on the deposits made for the forest clearance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.