Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Interest earned by an educational institution on unspent Government grant funds temporarily parked in bank accounts and FDRs was treated as incidental to the grants, not as an independent source of income. On the facts that the assessee was formed solely to run an engineering college, had land allotted by the State, received funding only through Government grants and allied contributions, and had no operational income while the college was under construction, it was held to be wholly or substantially financed by Government and entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab). As the quantum addition was deleted, the related penalty under section 270A was held purely consequential and unsustainable.
Interest earned by an educational institution on unspent Government grant funds temporarily parked in bank accounts and FDRs was treated as incidental to the grants, not as an independent source of income. On the facts that the assessee was formed solely to run an engineering college, had land allotted by the State, received funding only through Government grants and allied contributions, and had no operational income while the college was under construction, it was held to be wholly or substantially financed by Government and entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab). As the quantum addition was deleted, the related penalty under section 270A was held purely consequential and unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
