Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Reassessment initiated after four years from the end of the assessment year was held invalid where the original assessment had been completed under scrutiny and the recorded reasons showed that the information on alleged accommodation entries was already available during that assessment. In the absence of any allegation in the reasons that the assessee had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts, the jurisdictional requirement for reopening beyond four years was not met. The notice under section 148 and the consequential reassessment order were quashed, and the merits of the additions were left unexamined.
Reassessment initiated after four years from the end of the assessment year was held invalid where the original assessment had been completed under scrutiny and the recorded reasons showed that the information on alleged accommodation entries was already available during that assessment. In the absence of any allegation in the reasons that the assessee had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts, the jurisdictional requirement for reopening beyond four years was not met. The notice under section 148 and the consequential reassessment order were quashed, and the merits of the additions were left unexamined.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
