Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment initiated after four years from the end of the assessment year was held invalid where the original assessment had been completed under scrutiny and the recorded reasons showed that the information on alleged accommodation entries was already available during that assessment. In the absence of any allegation in the reasons that the assessee had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts, the jurisdictional requirement for reopening beyond four years was not met. The notice under section 148 and the consequential reassessment order were quashed, and the merits of the additions were left unexamined.
Reassessment initiated after four years from the end of the assessment year was held invalid where the original assessment had been completed under scrutiny and the recorded reasons showed that the information on alleged accommodation entries was already available during that assessment. In the absence of any allegation in the reasons that the assessee had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts, the jurisdictional requirement for reopening beyond four years was not met. The notice under section 148 and the consequential reassessment order were quashed, and the merits of the additions were left unexamined.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.