Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment initiated after four years from the end of the assessment year was held invalid where the original assessment had been completed under scrutiny and the recorded reasons showed that the information on alleged accommodation entries was already available during that assessment. In the absence of any allegation in the reasons that the assessee had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts, the jurisdictional requirement for reopening beyond four years was not met. The notice under section 148 and the consequential reassessment order were quashed, and the merits of the additions were left unexamined.
Reassessment initiated after four years from the end of the assessment year was held invalid where the original assessment had been completed under scrutiny and the recorded reasons showed that the information on alleged accommodation entries was already available during that assessment. In the absence of any allegation in the reasons that the assessee had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts, the jurisdictional requirement for reopening beyond four years was not met. The notice under section 148 and the consequential reassessment order were quashed, and the merits of the additions were left unexamined.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.