Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
On a conjoint reading of the conveyance deed and consent terms, the assessee was found to have relinquished all rights, title, interest and possession in the entire larger land, so the consideration was treated as a global settlement for extinguishment of the whole bundle of rights. The Tribunal held that the assessee's development and possessory rights were themselves a capital asset, and their extinguishment amounted to a transfer. As the indexed cost claimed related to those intangible rights, not to ownership of the physical land, restriction of cost by reference only to the portion conveyed was unsustainable. The deletion of the addition was upheld.
On a conjoint reading of the conveyance deed and consent terms, the assessee was found to have relinquished all rights, title, interest and possession in the entire larger land, so the consideration was treated as a global settlement for extinguishment of the whole bundle of rights. The Tribunal held that the assessee's development and possessory rights were themselves a capital asset, and their extinguishment amounted to a transfer. As the indexed cost claimed related to those intangible rights, not to ownership of the physical land, restriction of cost by reference only to the portion conveyed was unsustainable. The deletion of the addition was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
