Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Separate show cause notices required for each taxation period; common notice clubbing multiple years was struck down.
    Natural justice breach keeps writ open despite alternative remedy in assessment challenge; demand, penalty, and assessment were quashed.
    Limitation for consequential tax orders can abate assessment and nullify penalty when no valid order is passed.
    Transfer pricing re-characterisation of preference shares as loans rejected; interest disallowance on sister concern advances failed.
    Reassessment barred by change of opinion where audit objection reused issues already examined in scrutiny assessment.
    Bogus purchase additions limited to embedded profit component where bills were accommodation entries; restriction upheld on identical facts
    Mandatory hearing in rectification barred ex parte withdrawal of relief and made the order void
    Jurisdictional satisfaction for cash receipt penalty requires clear findings and independent proof; unsupported levy fails.
    Leave Fare Concession tax deduction: foreign-leg travel stays outside exemption, with default and interest following for non-deduction.
    Interest taxability on internal bank placements: payment-to-self receipts escaped tax, while bad-debt write-off and refund interest were addressed.
    Recorded satisfaction and corroborative proof are essential for section 271DA penalty on alleged cash-receipt violations.
    BOT road amortization must follow actual concession end date; debatable depreciation claim could not sustain penalty
    Section 80P deduction on bank-deposit interest follows when a co-operative credit society parks business funds temporarily.
    Customs supervision charges recoverable on Merchant Over Time basis when officers were used only part-day.
    Related-party import valuation: transaction value rejected, but Rule 8 revaluation largely failed under customs valuation rules
    Customs broker liability for export overvaluation rejected where KYC compliance, mandatory timelines and duplicate penalty all failed.
    Quashing criminal mining and PMLA proceedings requires trial on disputed evidence, as laundering stands distinct.
    PMLA initiation requires statutory satisfaction; predicate offence alone cannot compel ECIR registration or mandamus by a writ court
    PMLA attachment over PACL assets yields to a special investor restitution framework and cannot continue in parallel.
    Minimum Average Balance is a contractual condition, not taxable consideration, and service tax notices were quashed.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Revised post-survey construction cost estimates, TDR and...

      Percentage of Completion Method demands detailed verification of revised project costs, TDR allocation, and GST impact before revenue recognition.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Income TaxJuly 7, 2026Case LawsAT
      Revised post-survey construction cost estimates, TDR and development rights allocation, and GST impact on project cost under the Percentage of Completion Method depended on detailed factual verification. The text notes that the revised projections were linked to changes in floor plans, phase-wise utilisation of development rights, denial of input tax credit under the revised GST scheme, and consistency of revenue recognition with registered agreements. It records that broad explanations and estimated workings were insufficient, so the revised computation could not be finally accepted without examining the factual foundation. The disputed additions were therefore set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo verification and fresh decision for both assessment years.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax