Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    ESOP deduction under section 37(1) upheld as jurisdictional High Court precedent prevailed despite pending Supreme Court challenge.
    Limitation and valid satisfaction note in section 153C proceedings defeated search assessments and a commission addition.
    Mechanical approval under section 148B invalidates consequential assessments for want of application of mind
    TDS credit follows the year of income assessability, not the deductor's later reporting, with duplicate claim safeguards.
    Limitation and reasonable cause defeat penalty on cash receipt for genuine agricultural land sale under section 271D
    Voluntary retirement compensation exemption accepted under section 10(10B) after Tribunal followed prior co-ordinate bench precedent.
    Business-use property not taxable as house property where records showed active operational use and notional rental valuation failed.
    Underwriting commission to a non-resident was not fees for technical services because no technical knowledge was made available.
    Arm's length interest on inter-company loans cannot be raised solely for unsecured subsidiary lending where no fresh risk change is shown.
    Transfer pricing comparability challenge rejected where Revenue sought first-time exclusion of an accepted comparable before the Tribunal.
    Transfer pricing, TDS and revenue expense issues resolved by following earlier rulings in recurring group-company disputes.
    Contract expenditure allowed where unrebutted documentary evidence proved subcontract payments and supported the corresponding income claim.
    Liberal construction of sufficient cause justifies condonation of inordinate delay where criminal proceedings and jail confinement explained the defau...
    Penalty under section 272A(1)(d) deleted after quantum proceedings were restored and the assessee's conduct was considered.
    Debatable provident fund adjustment cannot be made under prima facie processing when jurisdictional precedent favours the assessee.
    Public-domain data access and marketing support services failed royalty and make-available tests under the India-US DTAA.
    Taxability of buy-back interest depends on actual receipt and proof that premium or interest was income in the assessee's hands.
    Unexplained investment addition deleted where only third-party material existed and no corroborative evidence linked the assessee to on-money payment.
    Jurisdictional sanction for reassessment: invalid section 148 notice without the correct section 151 authority made revision unsustainable.
    Telescoping of surplus funds and capital gains computation reduced additions, while section 54 deduction failed for lack of proof.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Revised post-survey construction cost estimates, TDR and...

Percentage of Completion Method demands detailed verification of revised project costs, TDR allocation, and GST impact before revenue recognition.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax July 7, 2026 Case Laws AT
Revised post-survey construction cost estimates, TDR and development rights allocation, and GST impact on project cost under the Percentage of Completion Method depended on detailed factual verification. The text notes that the revised projections were linked to changes in floor plans, phase-wise utilisation of development rights, denial of input tax credit under the revised GST scheme, and consistency of revenue recognition with registered agreements. It records that broad explanations and estimated workings were insufficient, so the revised computation could not be finally accepted without examining the factual foundation. The disputed additions were therefore set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo verification and fresh decision for both assessment years.

Topics

Acts Income Tax