Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Revised post-survey construction cost estimates, TDR and development rights allocation, and GST impact on project cost under the Percentage of Completion Method depended on detailed factual verification. The text notes that the revised projections were linked to changes in floor plans, phase-wise utilisation of development rights, denial of input tax credit under the revised GST scheme, and consistency of revenue recognition with registered agreements. It records that broad explanations and estimated workings were insufficient, so the revised computation could not be finally accepted without examining the factual foundation. The disputed additions were therefore set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo verification and fresh decision for both assessment years.
Revised post-survey construction cost estimates, TDR and development rights allocation, and GST impact on project cost under the Percentage of Completion Method depended on detailed factual verification. The text notes that the revised projections were linked to changes in floor plans, phase-wise utilisation of development rights, denial of input tax credit under the revised GST scheme, and consistency of revenue recognition with registered agreements. It records that broad explanations and estimated workings were insufficient, so the revised computation could not be finally accepted without examining the factual foundation. The disputed additions were therefore set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo verification and fresh decision for both assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.