Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Misdeclaration in customs classification led to denial of exemption and confirmation of differential duty, which was sustained because the importer accepted that the notification benefit was not available. However, once the importer paid the differential duty, interest and the prescribed 15% penalty and informed the department, the proceedings attained finality under section 28(6); no further penalty beyond that limit and no redemption fine could be imposed. The appeal was partly allowed on that basis.
Misdeclaration in customs classification led to denial of exemption and confirmation of differential duty, which was sustained because the importer accepted that the notification benefit was not available. However, once the importer paid the differential duty, interest and the prescribed 15% penalty and informed the department, the proceedings attained finality under section 28(6); no further penalty beyond that limit and no redemption fine could be imposed. The appeal was partly allowed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
