Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Misdeclaration in customs classification led to denial of exemption and confirmation of differential duty, which was sustained because the importer accepted that the notification benefit was not available. However, once the importer paid the differential duty, interest and the prescribed 15% penalty and informed the department, the proceedings attained finality under section 28(6); no further penalty beyond that limit and no redemption fine could be imposed. The appeal was partly allowed on that basis.
Misdeclaration in customs classification led to denial of exemption and confirmation of differential duty, which was sustained because the importer accepted that the notification benefit was not available. However, once the importer paid the differential duty, interest and the prescribed 15% penalty and informed the department, the proceedings attained finality under section 28(6); no further penalty beyond that limit and no redemption fine could be imposed. The appeal was partly allowed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
