Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Misdeclaration in customs classification led to denial of exemption and confirmation of differential duty, which was sustained because the importer accepted that the notification benefit was not available. However, once the importer paid the differential duty, interest and the prescribed 15% penalty and informed the department, the proceedings attained finality under section 28(6); no further penalty beyond that limit and no redemption fine could be imposed. The appeal was partly allowed on that basis.
Misdeclaration in customs classification led to denial of exemption and confirmation of differential duty, which was sustained because the importer accepted that the notification benefit was not available. However, once the importer paid the differential duty, interest and the prescribed 15% penalty and informed the department, the proceedings attained finality under section 28(6); no further penalty beyond that limit and no redemption fine could be imposed. The appeal was partly allowed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
